PDA

View Full Version : A Conservative Doctrine, Setting the Record Straight


Anthony D Dolpies
07-05-2009, 11:21 PM
While listening to a radio show I heard a caller pose an interesting question that touched on the radio host berating liberal faith in government, the caller asking, why conservatives have faith in business, when business' do things like lay people off after many years of service. The host addressed the historical and current litany of big government failures & liberal programs. I believe the host missed the boat on this one, he had a chance to define conservatisim to someone who had been fed nothing but the left wing mantra.

For to long now conservatives and liberals have been linked to the politics pertaining to either democrats or republicans. The national media has been allowed to characterize these two philosophies based on false pretenses. I would like to take this opportunity to set the record straight. Let us look at John F. Kennedy, this was one of our more conservative presidents in recent history. Kennedy sought to reign in the federal reserve, cut taxes including the capitol gains tax, Kennedy knew believed that the individual was a better steward of his money and that a healthy investor class was a crucial part of a strong economy. Kennedy was a hawk on defense and was extremely anti-communist. (makes you wonder what happened to Ted) Let's not forget his most famous tag line "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." So in just about about every way JFK a democrat was more conservative than either Bush forty-one or forty-three. I grew up in, and still reside in Philadelphia, a democrat stronghold. almost all of my neighbors are democrats, however the larger percentage of these people are not liberals. Many of them are vehemently opposed to welfare programs, abortion, and I meet very few people who really feel good about the idea of raising taxes on anybody. It is safe to say that being a conservative has little to do with being a republican or democrat in as much as they are the most popular political parties of the day.

So what or even better, who is the American conservative? It is true, the American conservative is sckeptical of and distrusts government. He believes in the adage that "government is best which governs least", that law should not impede ones liberty, or be crafted to confiscate his property, or for the purpose of catering to the changing attitudes, whims or agendas of constituents or legislators. The conservative does not trust business in so much as he trusts human nature. He understands that a person is more likely to provide honest service and good products when motivated by the profits and incentives of repeat patronage. He also does not expect everyone to be on the level in regard to honesty and integrity.

On social issues I once read an article by that summed things up real well. "Big government is not a fiscal issue: these programs are not wrong because there unaffordable, there unaffordable because there wrong. They are just not the proper role of government." The conservative believes that government should be managed morally, government should not and can not manage morality. When government bureaucracy is formed to engineer a social or moral outcome they become vehicles for corruption and waste. When these programs are instituted by government they have devastating unintended consequences on society. A good example of this is the community re-investment act. The consequences of which we are dealing with today. It was Thomas Jefferson who said "there is no act' however virtuous, for which ingenuity may not find some bad motive." The conservative is not heartless, or mean spirted, statistics show time and time again that people who identify themselves as conservatives give larger percentages of their income to charity than those who identify themselves as liberals. He does not have a problem assisting hard working individual for a period of time if that person has fallen on hard times. But it is Crucial that we do not foster a system of dependency and an ever expanding welfare state. This only empowers government and causes a recession of liberty.

Freedom of religion does not mean freedom from it. The first amendment forbids not just the government endorsement of a particular religion, but forbids any law that prohibits the free exercise of it. So If a group of children who attend a public school want to pray privately it is unconstitutional for the school administration to say they are not allowed.

The conservative understands that along with the greatness of humanity comes the bad. Racism, injustice, crime and all the other dark aspects of the human experience are realities that only contact, economic interaction, communication and real education can reduce. I say reduce because human nature will never allow any measure of law or politically correct language to eliminate them. For Example If red ink is deemed to be traumatizing and substituted with purple, eventually purple becomes red.

The conservative understands that the natural state of man, freedom, is always in conflict with governments ever present capacity for expansion. We must keep a watch full eye, limiting this leviathan at every opportunity, so as to not extinguish the rare flame of liberty.

Anthony D Dolpies
http://conservativerepublic.org

James Cramer
08-14-2009, 03:39 AM
Great Post. You are exactly right.

As Glenn Beck said regarding the 912 Project:
The 9-12 Project is designed to bring us all back to the place we were on September 12, 2001. The day after America was attacked we were not obsessed with Red States, Blue States or political parties. We were united as Americans, standing together to protect the greatest nation ever created.

Your right, we should only care about being conservatives and getting rid of big goverment. The government should be out of everything except the military. We should live by the TEN COMMANDMENTS and the CONSTITUTION.

Please read my post about the Ten Commandments. We need to re-word the 912 Principles to better refect the freedom, the constitution, and ten commandments. The ideas should remain the same, just the wording. Glenn Beck has some brilliant ideas. I just think some can be taken the wrong way and turn against our own ideals.

You're right about Democrat and Republican. I thought Bush was a great for protecting us from terrorism and our enemies who don't love freedom. But he just spent too much money. That's not conservative. He should have just spent on military and homeland security. If he was a true conservative, he would have gotten rid of a lot of government programs. I guess he try to get rid of Social Security. He should have went after employer-sponsored healthcare and medicare. Then maybe our healthcare would not have been so expensive now, because the free-market would have increase competition and bring down prices. EMPLOYEE-SPONSORED HEALTHCARE eliminates competition, because people are not making their own choices. It's a group and also government subsidized. If people bought insurance individually like we buy everything else, competition would increase. We don't join groups to buy car insurance or home insurance.

If you believe in free-markets, join me and opt out of employer-sponsored healthcare. Join the free-market. Write your congressman to get rid of tax breaks for employers and employees for their group, anti-free market employer healthcare insurance.

Referee
09-05-2009, 11:47 AM
I really like the opening post in this thread. The problem, as I see it is conservatives are far too easily distracted by the specific issue(s) of the moment. If they would come up with brief but effective descriptions of conservatism, and then use them every time they are put in a position of defending conservatism through a specific issue, they could move the masses.

Former President Ronald Reagan was labeled "The Great Communicator". He attracted many because he constantly voiced conservative principles. He started each principle in a small and concise manner. He then followed up on the principle by elaborating and giving witness with examples of how it is and can be applied.

This is an extremely simple concept, yet far too often, almost all of us are distracted by the issue at hand. Far too often conservatives find themselves on the defensive. They feel the need to defend a particular view rather than espouse and voice conservative principles. I believe this is not by accident because liberals force conservatives to stay on defense. This is the method by which liberals battle anyone running as a conservative, and they have honed it to a razor sharp science.

Ronaldus Maximus (Reagan) constantly took the battle to the left. He forced them to defend their positions. He challenged them to defend their unstated opinion that the government was better at managing all affairs of human existence. He constantly voiced encouragement and defended the spirit of the free individual as well as the good that comes from a free society. He took a proactive approach that worked to win landslide elections.

Contrast that to what we see from recent debates. We see liberals throwing out talking points that empower them to be able to use labels. Once liberals put conservatives on the defensive they can call them racist, sexist and homophobic, or whatever other label they can come up with. Far too often conservatives fall into this pathetic, coercive trap. Once they do, they become the victim of the liberal's goal. Once conservatives are taken off the message of the greatness that is the experiment which produced more benefit to all mankind, they lose.

So I really agree with Anthony D Dolpies with the exception that I think conservatives should never even consider defending conservatism. They should learn to communicate the benefits of conservatism and its values, and they should openly express it at every opportunity.

But then again, that's just my opinion.

George Mattson
Hiawatha, KS

The Referee
...because I call 'em like "I" see 'em...

Anthony D Dolpies
09-05-2009, 06:50 PM
Hey Ref thanks for your response & I agree that the pseudo-conservative gets stuck in the we can do big government better argument. which is always a loser. However this is not a defense of conservatism just an explanation of principles for those who lack a true frame of reference